Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

³× °¡Áö Àüµ¿ Ni-Ti ÆÄÀÏÀÇ danger zone¿¡¼­ÀÇ ±Ù°ü¼ºÇü·Â

Shaping Ability of Four Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instruments to Prepare Root Canal at Danger Zone

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Á¸ÇÐȸÁö 2004³â 29±Ç 5È£ p.446 ~ 453
¹Ú¼º¿¬, ½É´ëº¸, ¹ÚÇöÁø, ¼®Ãæ±â,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹Ú¼º¿¬ (  ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
½É´ëº¸ (  ) - °Ç±¹´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç
¹ÚÇöÁø (  ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
¼®Ãæ±â (  ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç

Abstract

ÇÏ¾Ç ´ë±¸Ä¡ ±Ù½ÉÄ¡±ÙÀÇ danger zone¿¡¼­ ¼öÁ¾ÀÇ Àüµ¿ ´ÏÄÌ-ƼŸ´½ ÆÄÀÏÀÇ ±Ù°ü¼ºÇü·ÂÀ» ±Ù°ü¼ºÇü ÀüÈÄ Ä¡Áú µÎ²²ÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿© Æò°¡ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±â±¸¿¡ µû¶ó ÃÑ 40°³ÀÇ ÇÏ¾Ç ´ë±¸Ä¡¸¦ 10°³¾¿ Profile/sup (R)/, GT Rotary file, Quantec ¹× ProTaper 4°³ ±ºÀ¸·Î ³ª´©°í °¢ Ä¡¾Æ´ç 2°³ÀÇ ±Ù°üÀ» straight up-and-down°ú anticurvature ±ºÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾î ±Ù´ÜºÎ ±Ù°üÀ» ¸ðµÎ 30¹ø Å©±â·Î ÀÏÁ¤ÇÏ°Ô È®´ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼öÁ¤µÈ Bramante¹ýÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ¼úÀü ¹× ¼úÈÄÀÇ ±Ù°ü »ó¾ÆÁú µÎ²²¸¦ Ä¡¼öÀú ÇϹæ 1, 3 ¹× 5 mmÁöÁ¡¿¡¼­ ÃøÁ¤, ÀÌ¿øº¯·®ºÐ¼®¹ýÀ¸·Î Åë°èºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸ðµç ±ºÀÇ danger zone°ú safe zone¿¡¼­ÀÇ straight up-and-down µ¿ÀÛ°ú anticurvature µ¿ÀÛ »çÀÌ¿¡´Â Ä¡±Ù»ó¾ÆÁú µÎ²²º¯È­¿¡ ÇöÀúÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»Áö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù (p > 0.05). ProTaper´Â danger zone°ú safe zone ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ ´Ù¸¥ ±â±¸¿¡ ºñÇØ ¸¹Àº ·®ÀÇ ±Ù°ü»ó¾ÆÁú »èÁ¦¸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç ƯÈ÷ ºÐÁöºÎ 3 mm ¼öÁØ¿¡¼­ ÇöÀúÇÏ¿´´Ù(p < 0.05).

The aim of this study was to evaluate the shaping abilities of four different rotary nickel-titanium instruments with anticurvature motion to prepare root canal at danger zone by measuring the change of dentin thickness in order to have techniques of safe preparation of canals with nickel-titanium files. Mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals of forty mesial roots of extracted human lower molars were instrumented using the crown-down technique with ProFile, GT/sup TM/ Rotary file, Quantec file and ProTaper/sup TM/. In each root, one canal was prepared with a straight up-and-down motion and the other canal was with an anticurvature motion. Canals were instrumented until apical foramens were up to size of 30 by one operator. The muffle system was used to evaluate the root canal preparation. After superimposing the pre- and post-instrumentation canal. change in root dentin thickness was measured at the inner and outer sides of the canal at 1. 3, and 5 mm levels from the furcation. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. Root dentin thickness at danger zone was significantly thinner than that at safe zone at all levels (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the change of root dentin thickness between the straight up-and-down and the anticurvature motions at both danger and safe zones in all groups (p > 0.05). ProTaper removed significantly more dentin than other files especially at furcal 3 mm level of danger and safe zones (p < 0.05) Therefore, it was concluded that anticurvature motion with nickel-titanium rotary instruments does not seem to be effective in danger zone of lower molars.

Shaping ability;Ni-Ti rotary instrument;Root canal preparation;Danger zone;Anticurvature filing;ProTaper

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI